<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><default:channel xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" rdf:about="http://Changesatwork.blog.co.uk/"><title>Ch-ch-ch-ch...changes at work</title><link>http://Changesatwork.blog.co.uk/</link><description></description><dc:language xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">en-EU</dc:language><admin:generatorAgent xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" rdf:resource="http://www.blog.co.uk"/><sy:updatePeriod xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">hourly</sy:updatePeriod><sy:updateFrequency xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">8</sy:updateFrequency><sy:updateBase xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://Changesatwork.blog.co.uk/2008/02/18/when_even_hr_doesn_t_get_change~3746070/"/></rdf:Seq></items></default:channel><default:item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" rdf:about="http://Changesatwork.blog.co.uk/2008/02/18/when_even_hr_doesn_t_get_change~3746070/"><default:title>When even HR doesn't get change...</default:title><default:link>http://Changesatwork.blog.co.uk/2008/02/18/when_even_hr_doesn_t_get_change~3746070/</default:link><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2008-02-18T18:46:01+01:00</dc:date><default:description>	&lt;p&gt;We're working on a big but simple transformation at our place. Switching from one IT platform to another.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Guess what...IT are leading things and their focus as a result is on installation NOT implementation. Not unusual. &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;So we set about seeking to turn this around, get some broader focus, think about people and their likely willingness to work on the new platform. I reach out to our Change Office at Corporate. Good guys and part of HR. My shock when they explain that for them "change" means the "HR part of the project". &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Wow. They see change as magic dust that turns people to advocates. Surely change includes:&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;- Programme management&lt;br&gt;
- Vision of the future; and why it's a good place&lt;br&gt;
- Stakeholder analysis&lt;br&gt;
- Value assessment and monitoring&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;And then we can make sure the IT guys are delivering their side of the bargain.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;So if our HR team don't understand this concept that makes my job tough. &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Time to go talk to the project sponsors and awaken them. The reality is that if we keep going how we are = project failure. Watch this space.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://Changesatwork.blog.co.uk/2008/02/18/when_even_hr_doesn_t_get_change~3746070/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</default:description><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[	<p>We're working on a big but simple transformation at our place. Switching from one IT platform to another.</p>
	<p>Guess what...IT are leading things and their focus as a result is on installation NOT implementation. Not unusual. </p>
	<p>So we set about seeking to turn this around, get some broader focus, think about people and their likely willingness to work on the new platform. I reach out to our Change Office at Corporate. Good guys and part of HR. My shock when they explain that for them "change" means the "HR part of the project". </p>
	<p>Wow. They see change as magic dust that turns people to advocates. Surely change includes:</p>
	<p>- Programme management<br>
- Vision of the future; and why it's a good place<br>
- Stakeholder analysis<br>
- Value assessment and monitoring</p>
	<p>And then we can make sure the IT guys are delivering their side of the bargain.</p>
	<p>So if our HR team don't understand this concept that makes my job tough. </p>
	<p>Time to go talk to the project sponsors and awaken them. The reality is that if we keep going how we are = project failure. Watch this space.
</p>
<p> <small> <a href="http://Changesatwork.blog.co.uk/2008/02/18/when_even_hr_doesn_t_get_change~3746070/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p>]]></content:encoded></default:item></rdf:RDF>
