<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><id>tag:changesatwork.blog.co.uk,2009-11-10:/</id><title>Ch-ch-ch-ch...changes at work</title><link rel="self" href="http://changesatwork.blog.co.uk/feed/atom/posts/"/><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://Changesatwork.blog.co.uk/"/><generator version="1.0">MokoFeed</generator><updated>2009-11-10T10:16:23+01:00</updated><entry><id>tag:changesatwork.blog.co.uk,2008-02-18:/2008/02/18/when_even_hr_doesn_t_get_change~3746070/</id><title>When even HR doesn't get change...</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://Changesatwork.blog.co.uk/2008/02/18/when_even_hr_doesn_t_get_change~3746070/"/><author><name>Change-at-work</name></author><published>2008-02-18T18:46:01+01:00</published><updated>2008-02-18T18:46:01+01:00</updated><content type="html">	&lt;p&gt;We're working on a big but simple transformation at our place. Switching from one IT platform to another.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Guess what...IT are leading things and their focus as a result is on installation NOT implementation. Not unusual. &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;So we set about seeking to turn this around, get some broader focus, think about people and their likely willingness to work on the new platform. I reach out to our Change Office at Corporate. Good guys and part of HR. My shock when they explain that for them "change" means the "HR part of the project". &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Wow. They see change as magic dust that turns people to advocates. Surely change includes:&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;- Programme management&lt;br&gt;
- Vision of the future; and why it's a good place&lt;br&gt;
- Stakeholder analysis&lt;br&gt;
- Value assessment and monitoring&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;And then we can make sure the IT guys are delivering their side of the bargain.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;So if our HR team don't understand this concept that makes my job tough. &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Time to go talk to the project sponsors and awaken them. The reality is that if we keep going how we are = project failure. Watch this space.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://Changesatwork.blog.co.uk/2008/02/18/when_even_hr_doesn_t_get_change~3746070/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</content></entry></feed>
